Page 70 - 595892 Sun City proof_FinalTrim
P. 70

Going Green
&Clean

                                                                                                                          PHOTOS COURTESY OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

Located 50 miles west of Amarillo, the Spinning Spur 3 wind project has been providing more than 90 percent of the power
for the City of Georgetown since September 2015.

          By George Przybys                    ables has been contracted to provide 144    a little bit better to breathe.
                                               megawatts (MW) of wind energy through
We all know we live in a great                 2039, while SunEdison will provide 150      Looking at the costs, it is clear the de-
           community, in a great state, in     MW of PV energy through 2042. The total     cision was the right one. In November
           a great country. What you may       contracted power is twice as much as is     2015, the New York-based investment
not know is that Georgetown, the fastest       currently used during the most demand-      bank Lazard published a study on the
growing U.S. city of its size, will no longer  ing day. The city will sell off any excess  current U.S. electrical production costs.
be purchasing electrical energy produced       power to Energy Reliability Council of      They found costs per hour ran as follows:
from fossil fuels. By the end of April, wind   Texas (ERCOT). The needs for future         onshore wind turbines $32-$77; large
turbines and photovoltaic (PV) solar cells     energy will be adequately met with the      scale PV, $50-$60; coal-fired, $65-$150,
will supply 100% of our community’s elec-      two contracts, even with our current        and nuclear, $97. With increasing num-
trical energy. With a population rapidly       rate of population growth. While reduc-     bers of PV panels being manufactured
approaching 70,000, Georgetown will            ing the carbon footprint (carbon dioxide    and technological improvements in solar
become the fourth and largest city (by         emissions) was not a part of the decision   to electrical energy conversion efficiency,
population) in the U.S. to do so.              process, the result is no less impressive:  the kW cost continues to drop. It should
                                               the net annual reduction will be approxi-   be noted that the cost for PV energy is
The move to renewable energy was based         mately 24,000 pounds of carbon dioxide      based upon the amount of sunshine at
strictly upon the purchase price of an elec-   per household. And with approximately       the collection site. The lowest prices are
trical kilowatt (kW) generated from the        25,000 households, our air may just get     in the sunniest locations.
combination of wind and solar versus that
from fossil fuels or nuclear. EDF Renew-                                                   Wind turbine generated electrical energy

68 | SUNRAYS JANUARY 2017                                                                                                             ONLINE: SCTEXAS.ORG
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75